Article

The State System

The Berlin WallWalls, fences, oceans and mountains, all of them can serve the purpose of a border. The true idea of a border is to set an end to one state, and the beginning to another. But what exactly is a state? In this short article I’ll tell you.

First of all, we have to do some research on the history of the state system, as we have to realize that we indeed live in such. Everything began in Europe (of course), where in medieval times there were many different sized and interdependent territorial entities that were run by semi-free leaders. Sometimes it was a king, who had to subordinate himself to an emperor, and sometimes baron, who was bound to his king. Of course, this only is one dimension of the system. The second was the church: Here we had the pope, archbishops, bishops and so on. With time, this system evolved to the one we know from our newspapers (and blogs).

In Europe, competition was — is — everything, and that very unproductive authoritarian system was finally substituted by the (mostly) secular one. In between, Europeans colonized the world: After having established it in the 17th century, it spread to North America (18th century), South America, Japan (19th century both) and finally to the rest.

But what makes a state? In my book-review1 process I stumbled across a very interesting, yet simple list of values:

  • Security
  • Freedom
  • Order and justice
  • Welfare

On the basis of these key elements they are classifiable: We distinguish between strong and weak powers, as well as strong and weak states. E.g.

  • The US are a strong power and a strong state.
  • Russia is a strong power, but a weak state.
  • Sweden is a strong state, but a weak power.
  • Somalia is a weak power and a weak state.

Knowing these classifications, we can go on and focus on those elements, that make a modern state.

  1. ”International Relations — Theories and approaches” by R. Jackson and G. Sørensen, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, 1999 []

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Modern Taiwan: A steady chrisis.

Taipei

After World War II, many things have changed in Asia. Japan had to withdraw from all of its colonies, other nations began to occupy the released space. So happened with the island of Taiwan. Being a part of the Japanese Empire since 1895, it soon became one of the most prosperous places in Asia (right after Japan itself, of course). The Japanese built a strong prefectural governmental system, invested heavily in the island’s infrastructure, and even had then Prince, later Emperor Shōwa, come visit.

As said, after the loss of war, Japanese had to withdraw. Mainland Chinese soon occupied the island, and instead of freeing it, they too conquered. After extensive expropriations several Taiwanese uprisings were the consequence, Chiang Kai-shek sent even more of his republican troops.

When in 1949 the Kuomintang had to flee here, everything changed. With 2 million mainland Chinese following them into exile, politics became more complicated, as the new People’s Republic sought to also get the island under its control. First of all, they began with two little groups of islands at their shore, still belonging to the Chinese Republic. Matsu and Quemoy were subject to many armed hostilities until today, but stood the pressure.

Nowadays, Taiwan is an example of well-working democracy. Having ended the rule of Kuomintang (changing it to a democratic party) in early 2000’s, the island starts to think about what its been offered. On the one hand, there is reality: A status-quo without most of important states regarding it as sovereign (but at least they now, they are). On the other hand there is the People’s Republic, having accomplished reunification with Hong Kong and Macau — without war. Is there one China, or what could a reunification bring to all of them?

There are many questions, but only one answer: What do you think how much damage the People’s Republic would suffer if it went into war with the Republic? None at all.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,